Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one million won shall be the one day.

The Defendant is a representative director of the “E”, who is an enterprise that imports and sells complete detention, etc. in Sil Si-si D.

피고인은 2015. 12. 3. 중국에서 ‘ 민속 전통놀이 대형 윷놀이 세트’ 288개를 수입하여 이를 거래처에 판매하던 중, ‘ 기준치 이상의 납 검출과 표시사항 미비의 사유’ 로 2016. 4. 27. 국가기술 표준 원으로부터 위 제품에 관한 수거명령을 받았다.

피고인은 2017. 3. 경 위 ‘E ’에서 불상의 거래처에 수거명령을 받은 위 ‘ 민속 전통놀이 대형 윷놀이 세트 ’를 판매하여, 위 제품이 인터넷 쇼핑 사이트인 ‘G 마켓’ 등을 통해 유통되도록 하는 방법으로 국가기술 표준 원의 수거명령을 따르지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement at the fifth public trial date in court;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A list, etc. of inspection and evaluation of the implementation of call;

1. Application of the statutes governing civil petition reports, photographs of products, results of tracking delivery, and sales slips;

1. Article 26 (1) 1 and Article 11 (1) of the Framework Act on Product Safety concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 26 (1) 1 and 11 of the same Act concerning the selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act of the order of provisional payment are as follows: (a) the accused has made a confession of a crime late; (b) the fact that the new product had already been released does not seem to be an intentional crime in light of the fact that the accused does not have any criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine; and (c) the accused has no criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine; and