폭행
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
1. On October 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 02:50, the charge was committed on the exterior of the building outside of the C Hospital located in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu; (b) the victim D (27 years of age) who is a doctor of the above hospital (hereinafter “the victim of the above hospital would have been suffering from scarcity in a medical institution”; and (c) the victim stated “the victim “the victim would have been suffering from scarcity, age, scarcity, and sar,” and assaulted the victim at one time on the left part of the victim’s hand; and (d) the victim E (25 years of age), who is a security guard of the above hospital, was her home home to the Defendant, and walked once knee knee knel kn, the victim’s left part of the Defendant’s body and knick kn, and kn the victim’s right part of the Defendant’s body.
2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.
However, according to the agreement submitted on October 24, 2014, after the institution of the instant prosecution, the victims expressed their intent not to be punished by the defendant. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.