When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant Appellant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle B.

On March 19, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on March 15:23, 2016, and led the front side of the fisheries intersection in the Hayang-Eup, Hayang-do, to the intersection of fisheries from the same Eup/Myeon.

In this case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by making it possible for the driver of the vehicle to properly see the front hour and accurately operate all the devices of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, while neglecting this, the Defendant, while stopping the victim C(38) driving the victim C(SM5) driving in the front of the signal signal at the front of the vehicle operated by the Defendant, caused the victim E (the victim 7 years old) who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle (the victim e.g., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e.g., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e., the victim e.,

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C

1. Article 5-3 subparag. 2 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes related to the crime, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the point of escape after the injury from duty) and Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of non-measures after the injury from duty) concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;