불법행위로 인한 손해배상청구의 소
1. The plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal and the incidental costs thereof shall be individually considered.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court concerning this case is that of the judgment of the court of first instance except for adding some content as set forth below, and thus, it is identical to that of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
[The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff and the grounds for incidental appeal by the defendant are not significantly different from each argument in the first instance court, and evidence adopted by the first instance court (which is not submitted in the first instance court).
According to the above, the fact-finding and decision of the first instance court are justifiable). 2. Additional part (1) Decision of the first instance court 1. B. Decision of the second instance court
The Defendant added “Defendant” after February 2, 2019 in the first place of appeal.
(2) 1. B/L of the second decision of the first instance.
After the last part of the main sentence of Paragraph 1, the phrase “the Defendant sent” was added to the phrase “(the foregoing text messages sent and received by the Defendant and C include a secret conversation, such as a speech that C does not have a sexual intercourse with another woman who is not himself/herself).”
(3) The third party decision of the first instance court.
After the part of the "the defendant's attitude" in the third part of the appeal, the relationship between the defendant and C (C was the defendant who was the head of a high school prior to marriage with the plaintiff), and the defendant's improper act was added to the effect that the defendant's marital life between the plaintiff and C (the plaintiff and C did not result in divorce due to the above improper act).
3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and all the plaintiff's appeal and the defendant's incidental appeal are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.