However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 21, 2017, at around 20:05, the Defendant returned home to the E cafeteria located in E cafeteria D, the Defendant: (a) brought a dispute with the victim F, a workplace partner, on the ground that the victim was aware of the Defendant’s horse in front of his commercial; (b) took the victim’s face once a week due to drinking; (c) took the victim’s chest once a stop; and (d) took the victim’s face one time due to a minor disease, which is a dangerous object in the surrounding area, the Defendant laid the victim’s face for about four weeks; and (d) took approximately six weeks back to the right side of the victim’s face; and (e) laid the heart of the inner part of the left side.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each on-site photograph, death diagnosis report, and each medical certificate;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. The sentencing criteria are not set in the case of special injury on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following favorable circumstances):

The degree of injury of the victim is very significant, the defendant recognizes the facts of the crime of this case, the agreement with the victim is reached, there is no record of punishment for the same criminal record, and other consideration of the circumstances of this case, etc.