사기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable (over to eight months of imprisonment) (the Defendant withdrawn his/her argument of mental and physical weakness on the date of the first trial of the first trial of the first instance court). 2. The Defendant’s decision reflects the mistake, and all the circumstances agreed with the victims are recognized.
However, even though the defendant was punished more than 13 times due to the crime without prison labor, he repeatedly committed each of the crimes of this case during the same repeated crime period.
Some of the crimes (the court below's 2017 order 1311) are to pay the next day's drinking value as the defendant was called by a police officer by taking a secret door in another singing room.
A person who commits a crime immediately after he/she was returned home, and thus is also a bad.
In addition, considering the various circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc., the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed unfair because it is too large.
Therefore, the defendant's argument of sentencing is without merit.
3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless.