However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 22, 2014, from around 20:30 to 21:00 on the same day, the Defendant was able to avoid a disturbance, such as: (a) from the first floor of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Macro Macro; (b) under the influence of alcohol, and (c) under the influence of telephone communications, the Defendant, the victim, who is the victim, demanded D (70) to move out of the commercial building, “Neama Macro Macro,” and (b) the victim, who is the victim, was able to escape from the commercial building, even though the victim demanded to continue to move out of the commercial building.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the security service of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. According to Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the sentence was determined as ordered by the suspension of execution of imprisonment, taking into account the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s criminal records on the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are to be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor; and (b) the degree

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.