beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2017.04.21 2015고단1524

특수절도

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From 20:30 to 23:00 on April 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) laid down two doors and knicks of each of the entrances of the victim D Co., Ltd. in the scene of the new construction of the Daegu-gun apartment building in Daegu-gun Co., Ltd. into a incombustible tool; (b) destroyed and intruded into the inside, and then cut the light equivalent to the total market value of KRW 7.85,000,00 in total of the market value of the victim owned by the victim; (c) one, two, two, three, three, one, and one handbre.

At the above construction site, the defendant continued to remove and destroy the knobs of the victim E-containers of the victim limited partnership E-containers, and intrudes into the knobs, and has 4,100,000,000 won of the market value of the victim's possession, which is the victim's possession, and has stolen them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Protocols of partial examination of witnesses concerning G in the protocol of second public trial;

1. Each statement of H and I;

1. A fire-fighting report (the analysis, etc. of rolling stock flown and neighboring CCTV systems in residential areas);

1. A CCTV image appraisal report of the traffic accident appraiser;

1. Documents verifying communications;

1. Photographss and photographs of each CCTV course;

1. The CD (the Defendant denied the facts charged, but the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted by this court, namely, ① the offender and the Defendant, according to the CCTV image appraisal result on the day of the crime, are shaking back the left arms more than that of the Defendant’s walking, and the shape of the bridge is similar to that of another person, which seems to have a very unique feature that is distinguishable from that of the latter. ② The shape used by the Defendant at the time of the crime is very similar even though the pattern of the mother and the mother used by the Defendant at the time of his attendance was peculiar, ③ the Defendant did not have the same hat as the Defendant worn by the police officer on May 3, 2015, while, at the police station on May 22, 2015, the Defendant showed that he/she had a black cap on his/her house with the Defendant’s wearing on May 17, 2015.