2. Assertion and determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) lent KRW 69,200,000 to the Defendant. On January 27, 2014, F acquired from the Defendant the Gamba, which was operated by the Defendant, and decided to take over KRW 20,00,000 out of the Defendant’s obligation to the Plaintiff instead of paying KRW 20,000,000 out of the purchase amount, as the purchase amount is insufficient. Accordingly, the Defendant is obliged to pay the Plaintiff the remainder of KRW 49,20,000, which remains after deducting the above KRW 20,000,000 from the Defendant’s obligation to the Plaintiff. (2) The Defendant was engaged in food materials-related business in the netcheon Central Market, and the Defendant was engaged in the business for the Simba.

When the plaintiff invests his funds to the defendant, the defendant proposed that the defendant open and operate the room.

Accordingly, the Defendant, when opening a bed bank in the name of the Plaintiff, 15 million won in a bed bank in the name of the Plaintiff’s birth, was to bear KRW 15 million, ② opened a bed bank in the name of the Plaintiff’s 20 million, ③ opened a bed bank in the name of the Plaintiff’s 15 million, ③ opened a bed bank in the name of the Plaintiff’s 15 million won, ④ using the Plaintiff’s 53 million won in the name of the Defendant, while opening a bed bank in the Kim Sea in the name of the Defendant.

The remainder 16.2 million won was used to purchase the gift certificates necessary for the operation of the room.

The plaintiff brought all of the revenue of the above skin, <1> the plaintiff disposed of the flusium, <2> the flusium was transferred to F; 3, the flusium was currently in operation of the plaintiff; 4, the flusium was asked to the flusium.

Therefore, the plaintiff's assertion that 69,200,000 won is a loan is not true.