When Defendant A was unable to repay the money borrowed from Defendant B from around 2015, the Defendants conspired to obtain a loan in the name of Defendant B by telephone to the lending company and doing so as to be as if Defendant B was the husband of Defendant A.

1. Violation of the Resident Registration Act;

A. On September 2, 2016, the Defendants applied for a loan of KRW 5 million in the name of E in the name of Samyang-gu, Daegu-gu, 1-Do, 45, the residence of Defendant A, by phoneing to Samyang-gu, 1-Do, 35, the third-party, the 45-way, Non-Korean-U.S., and Defendant A, who was requested by Counseling F, was aware of it.

The E resident registration number is written in paper, and the defendant B confirmed it, and then the counselor stated that he was his resident registration number.

B. On September 20, 2016, the Defendants filed an application for a loan of KRW 25 million in the name of E by telephone with the Korea Savings Bank near Samyangyang G, and Defendant A, upon receiving a request from the Counseling Institute G, was aware of the fact.

The E resident registration number is written in paper, and the defendant B confirmed it, and then the counselor stated that he was his resident registration number.

The Defendants conspired to use the E resident registration number twice in a fraudulent manner.

2. Fraud;

A. The Defendants: (a) by deceiving the victim’s Non-Korean Capitals at the time and places described in paragraph (a) of Article 1, and then, (b) transferred KRW 5 million to the Daegu Bank Account in the name of E from the injured party.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.

B. The Defendants, as mentioned above at the date, time, and place specified in Paragraph 1-B, had the victim’s savings bank enticed, and had the victim transferred KRW 25 million to the Daegu Bank account in the name of E from the victim.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to attract the victim to receive the goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ 1.