Around July 13, 2010, the Defendant stated that “D” located in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu, would buy 60 million won of curios, such as earth and sand, for the victim E with KRW 270,000,000. The price shall be paid up to September 13, 2010.”

However, even if the defendant received curios from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to pay the price.

Accordingly, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim, received two points from the victim, which are the sum of KRW 60 million in total, KRW 270,000, KRW 187, 87, 8, 1, 2, 2, 2.

On June 4, 2011, the Defendant proposed that “H operated by the victim G in Daegu-gu, Seoul-gu, the Defendant issued 10 points on the part of the victim, “If there is any curios kept by the person who wants to purchase the curios, he/she shall receive 10% of the internal fee and sell it instead, and immediately return it if it is not sold,” and received 10 points from the victim.

On June 16, 201, the Defendant embezzled 10,000 won in consideration of the market price of 22,00,000 won among 10,000,000 won, and 8,000,000 won in the market price of 10,000 won in order to cover the expenses consumed by the Defendant for selling Dogdoggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggs

Summary of Evidence

"2013 Highest 6994"

1. The defendant's legal statement (the statement on the 10th trial date);

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partially the defendant's prosecution;

1. The statement of E in the second police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. Sales contract "2014 Highest 6226";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. G. G.