손해배상(자)
1. The Defendant: KRW 35,751,569 for Plaintiff A; KRW 1,00,000 for Plaintiff B; and KRW 500,00 for Plaintiff C and D, respectively.
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. 1) E is the basis for liability, Fro-type taxi (hereinafter “Defendant-Defendant vehicle”) around 20:50 on March 16, 201.
) While driving a vehicle and driving a vehicle in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, by bypassing the Hmat front road located in G from the search station to the horizontal tunnel room, the Plaintiff, who was negligent in neglecting his/her duty of care on the front side and the right side and right side side, was shocked with the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle’s driver’s seat and the front front side part of the Defendant’s vehicle’s driver’s seat, and was charged with the Plaintiff’s injury, such as an injury, such as the front part of the lower part of the Defendant’s driver’s seat (hereinafter “instant accident”).
(2) Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of each Plaintiff A, and the Defendant is the mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement on the Defendant’s vehicle.
B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case.
C. The limitation of liability: (a) the Plaintiff was responsible for the instant accident that occurred beyond the crosswalk at night; (b) the Plaintiff’s error appears to have caused the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damages; and (c) the Plaintiff’s registration was made due to visual disability Grade 4 and delay disability from August 27, 1997; and (c) the Plaintiff’s registration was performed with a traffic accident at around March 29, 198, after the above disabled person’s registration; (d) the Plaintiff’s traffic accident was caused by the vehicle accident at night, and suffered injury, such as the right-hand draf, and the right-hand draf, etc. at around June 14, 201; and (e) the Plaintiff’s liability was limited to 30% prior to the instant accident due to the pertinent 7% limitation of liability of the Plaintiffs, such as the instant traffic accident by driving over the left-hand part and the gake.
【Ground of recognition】 There is no dispute.