2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The defendant.

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff the remainder meal cost of KRW 2,050,000 and damages for delay, etc., on the ground that the Plaintiff provided meals equivalent to KRW 4,050,000 at the site of the studio construction work located in C, which is performed by the Defendant, and only paid KRW 2,00,000 out of the price.

B. As to this, the Defendant did not agree to pay food expenses to the Plaintiff in lump sum from the personnel expenses to be paid to the Plaintiff, if the Plaintiff settled the food expenses of the above construction site employees, and the Defendant did not agree to assume the Defendant liable for the meal expenses to the Plaintiff. The circumstance that the Plaintiff was unable to pay the meal expenses to the Plaintiff on the wind that the number of trees at the construction site of this case was not paid after receiving the personnel expenses, and that there was no agreement to pay the remainder of meal expenses.

2. As to whether the Defendant agreed to pay the meal cost provided to the Plaintiff to the father of the instant construction site, it is difficult to recognize the Plaintiff’s statement on the evidence No. 1 submitted by the Plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim cannot be accepted.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.