However, for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive, as against Defendant A.

1. On April 21, 2020: (a) around 22:00 to 22:30, Defendant A, within the main point of “D” located in Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, and the second floor of “D”, the Defendant: (b) carried out drinking together with the victim B (Nam, 43 years of age); (c) took one-time the part of the victim’s right side side, which is a dangerous object on the table, with the victim’s vision, and caused injury, such as the right side, where the victim’s treatment is unknown.

2. Defendant B collected plastic ices, which are dangerous objects on the tables, from the victim A (manam and 47 years old), at the above date and time, and at the above time and place, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim’s face by gathering them at one time and walking on the left side of the victim’s face one time, and by walking on the right side, the victim’s face cannot be identified.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. The Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of special injury);

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of suspended sentence: Reasons for sentencing under Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (the period of suspended sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months);

1. Considering Defendant A’s means of crime or the part of damage, the fact that the victim could have suffered serious injury is dangerous, and the fact that the Defendant first exercised violence is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

However, the circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and stated that his mistake is divided, that the defendant agreed with the victim B, that the defendant has no record of criminal punishment heavier than the fine, etc.

In addition, the records and arguments, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, and circumstances after the crime, are shown.