폭행등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault is dismissed.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On December 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months, suspension of execution of two years, and fine of four million won at the Chuncheon District Court on December 13, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 10, 2019.
"2018 Highest 881"
1. On August 10, 2018, around 20:40 on August 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) opened an entrance of a building that was not under the influence of alcohol to the studio building owned by the victim C (the age of 58) located in Chuncheon-si; and (b) opened an entrance of the building that was not under the influence of alcohol to the studio of the first floor, and intruded the victim’
2. The Defendant damaged property damage at the same time and place as the above paragraph 1 of this Article, and at the same time and place, the market value of the Plaintiff C, such as walking the door door of the said Dho Lake owned by the Victim C, caused the defects.
"2018 Highest 971"
1. On July 16, 2018, around 07:30 on July 16, 2018, the Defendant, at the “G” restaurant operated by the Victim F (F, 72 years of age) in Switzerland, expressed the Defendant’s desire to “the victim” by drinking alcohol to the above restaurant, referring “the victim” to “the victim” at the fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor of bitch,” thereby obstructing the victim’s restaurant business for a period of up to one hour by force.
2. At around 08:55 on the same day, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender, and was released on the same day. At around 12:00 on the same day, the Defendant sought the above restaurant again and obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force for about one hour, such as drinking alcohol that other customers drink, drinking alcohol, and drinking alcohol.
Summary of Evidence
"2018 Highest 881"
1. The Defendant’s partial statement in the court room is between H’s portrait and H’s studio, and there was no damage to the studio. However, according to each of the following evidence, H makes a statement to the effect that the Defendant did not enter the studio, and rather did not exist at the time. At the time, at the time, the Defendant’s studio was cut down with the studio and the studio was defective.