횡령
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the lower court rendered on the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable (the Defendant’s defense counsel, on August 1, 2017, asserted that the amount of the instant embezzlement is too excessive to KRW 5,500,000,00) due to the excessive unrefluence (the Defendant’s defense counsel, on the grounds of appeal on August 1, 2017, on the grounds of “misunderstanding of facts,” which stated that the amount of the instant embezzlement is too excessive to KRW 5,50,000,000,000,000,000,000).
2. The lower court determined the Defendant’s punishment within a reasonable scope by fully taking into account all the circumstances regarding the sentencing of the Defendant, and there is no circumstance to newly consider in the appellate court. Therefore, even considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.