2. The Defendant, who recognized the mistake of the instant crime, reflects his depth.

The period of operation of each game of this case is relatively short, and criminal proceeds from the defendant seems to be less significant.

It is also recognized that the defendant sent a bad time to the defendant, and that he was unable to carry out economic conditions due to the father's expenses incurred in hospital treatment.

However, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case in a short period without being aware of, even though he was under suspension of execution for the same kind of crime.

Although the period of operation of each game of this case is not long, the defendant transferred several times to several places, operated an illegal game site, and the defendant was employed by the head of the bar in order to avoid the control of the investigation agency, etc.

Each of the crimes of this case is likely to cause serious social harm, such as encouraging the gambling spirit of the general public and undermining their will to work, so it is necessary to strictize it.

In addition, even though the Defendant had been punished twice due to driving without a license, the Defendant was also driving without a license of this case.

In light of the above defendant's criminal records, the number of crimes, and the contents of crimes, it is inevitable to punish the defendant.

In addition, examining all the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct, environment, etc. of the defendant, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.