All appeals by prosecutors are dismissed.

A. The sentence of the lower court (two years and six months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence (a two years and six months of imprisonment, confiscation) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the records, the court below imposed punishment in consideration of various sentencing reasons, including the following: (a) the crime related to Bosing was committed with a very serious social harm; (b) the number of victims and the money that they acquired is considerably large; (c) the restoration of damage is not carried out; (d) the criminal proceeds actually acquired by the defendant are not large; and (e) there is no record of punishment exceeding the fine.

B. There is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment because new sentencing materials have not been submitted in the trial at the original court, and considering the various reasons for sentencing revealed in the oral proceedings, the lower court’s sentencing was too excessive or too heavy and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It does not appear.

(c)

Therefore, the argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.