At around 21:40 on December 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) stated that “D” Mat operated by the victim C in the Dongbcheon-si B had expressed his identification card to the Defendant who purchased alcoholic beverages; (b) the Defendant her employee and the victim expressed her desire to “I am her identification card; (c) I am her frier’s person in charge of her flab; and (d) caused the disturbance, such as passing her salut, and interfered with the victim’s mat operation by force for about 20 minutes until 22:00 of the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to C’s written statement;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 314 (1) of the Selection of Punishment;

1. A fine not exceeding 700,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Sentence (Consideration, etc., such as the fact that the defendant is the first offender, the fact that the defendant was listed in the public official examination preparation and again does not commit the same mistake, and that it appears obvious that the defendant clearly repents, and that the victim wanted not to want the punishment of the defendant);