beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.10.30 2019나2048296

임금

Text

All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The main grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance shows the evidence submitted in this court, the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified.

Therefore, the reasons why the court stated in this case are identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the partial dismissal of the judgment of the court of first instance according to the circumstance that the plaintiffs did not file an appeal, which is emphasized by this court. As such, the reasons why the court stated in this case are included in the summary under the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. From the end of the 6th judgment of the court of first instance to the end of the 7th judgment of the court of first instance, the 6th parallel to the 7th parallel shall be added as follows.

The appointment contract between the plaintiff and the joint plaintiff of the first instance court is based on the appointment contract (Evidence No. 5) of the insurance solicitor. Among them, the main contents of the appointment contract of the joint plaintiff A of the first instance court are as follows: "No. 44" in the 9th judgment of the first instance court of "No. 12, "No. 44, No. 73, No. 74" shall be added to "No. 44, No. 74".

Under the 10th judgment of the first instance, the "part of the plaintiffs" of the 4th judgment shall be followed as follows.

In other words, there are many cases where the plaintiffs have taken two or more consecutive days off, and in particular, the plaintiffs B took 63 days in total for one year from July 6, 2015, and the plaintiff A took 38 consecutive days (from May 18, 2015 to July 9, 2015) for one year from 56 consecutive days (from July 6, 2015 to October 5, 2015), and the plaintiff A took 40 days in total for one year from May 18, 2015. On the other hand, part of the joint plaintiffs of the first instance trial, "Plaintiff A" of the first instance judgment of the first instance court, as "A co-Plaintiff of the first instance trial," was written.

On the 17th page of the first instance judgment, the "(Plaintiff B, E, G, I, AA, AB, and AI)" shall be added to "(Plaintiff B, E, A, and AI)".

Part 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance is a few.