When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant and C are members of the Dober Doz. D, and the victim E is the owner of the "F" entertainment shop.

Around July 19, 2015, the Defendant and C calculated the alcohol value of 70,000 won with the members of the club in front of the F amusement week, and they returned to the victim E (53 years) who is a business owner and the beer 2 sick after drinking. While having a dispute, the victim was in a dispute, on the ground that the victim said that “the head of both fess are not required to do so.” The Defendant was fescing the bridge of the victim one time after drinking, and the victim was fesced when the victim’s face was fesced with drinking, and C did so in combination with this, after the victim’s drinking, and assault the victim’s head twice by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim jointly with C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police interrogation protocol to C and E;

1. Article 2(2) and (1)1 of the former Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016); Article 2(1) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act; selection of fines, etc.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.