According to the records, the defendant alleged in the reasoning of appeal that the crime of this case was committed in the state of mental disorder. On the first trial date of the court below, the defendant stated the reasons for appeal as above and did not clearly withdraw his claim as to mental disorder at the first trial date of the court below, but the court below did not consider the defendant's grounds for appeal as unfair sentencing, and did not determine

However, even after examining the records, the omission of the judgment by the court below is not likely to have been in a state of mental disorder at the time of the crime in this case.

subsection (b) of this section.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.