When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

From April 2014 to June 2014, the Defendant worked as a temporary worker in B’s tax accountant office. B’s office vicariously performed the accounting affairs of C Company (PresidentD) and E worked as the head of the above office and F as the employee of C Company.

At around 16:00 on May 17, 2017, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the above court case No. 2016Kadan210094 (Plaintiff E, Defendant D, and F) in Busan District Court 302, the Busan District Court Branch Branch Branch of the Busan District Court, the Busan District Court 2016Kadan2094 (Plaintiff E, Defendant D, and F).

When the presiding judge who examines the above case asked the defendant "I am asked the defendant that "I am knife the knife will knife the knife."

“Written reply,” and continuously the presiding judge called “(tax accountant office)”

the state in which the text was closed;

(1) The state of the concern;

Upon questioning “I asked before the office text.”

We was closed. It was closed.

Then, I responded to the statement that "the head of the house knows that the owner of the house is a person who owns the house," with a Hand-phone, sent back to the statement that "I know that the owner of the house is a person who owns the house."

“I asked the question”.

It is essential to receive a telephone during a meal.

Therefore, I tried to call this content.

The second presiding judge respondeded to “(E and F) currency content.”

It is asked that the monetary content "Igman," and the head of the office talks about the house, and it has been interested and sounded.

“The answer was made.”

However, in fact, the F, an employee of C company, did not speak knife that knife the knife, and the above office entrance was not closed, E received F's telephone and sent out of the restaurant, and the Defendant was about the currency from E, and there was no fact that E and F directly talked about the telephone.