beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.08.18 2016고단624

게임산업진흥에관한법률위반등

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B’s imprisonment of 6 months, Defendant C’s imprisonment of 4 months, and Defendant D’s fine of 5,00.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On March 15, 2016, A was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud in the Daejeon District Court's Incheon Branch of the Daejeon District Court, and on April 2, 2016, the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 2, 2016, and is currently subject to a trial at the Daejeon District Court (No. 1703, Feb. 19, 2014). Defendant B was sentenced to one year and ten months of imprisonment for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Daejeon District Court's Daejeon District Court on February 19, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on February 20, 2014.

Defendant

C On July 11, 2013, the Daejeon District Court rendered a judgment of two years of suspended execution in October 10 of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) in the Daejeon District Court's Incheon District Court's Support for the Punishment of Violences, etc., and the judgment was finally decided on July 19, 2013.

1. As to “F” from February 7, 2012 to February 20, 2012

(a) No person who violates the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of the Game Industry Promotion and Speculative Acts, Etc. shall commit an act that undermines the distribution order of game water by providing the distribution or use of game water which has not been rated, or displaying or keeping such things for such purpose, and shall engage in a speculative business using speculative gaming machines;

Nevertheless, from February 7, 2012 to February 20, 2012, the Defendants conspired to establish a 40-line “Malaysia” game machine, which is a game product in Asan City, which was not rated in the “F” located in G, in the said game site, and, after employing employees H, given 10,000 points to unspecified customers, the Defendants paid 200 points corresponding thereto, and anticipated a 1st class horse, 1,2, which is anticipated to be a short-class horse, and 50 points to be displayed, and caused a rash game in such a way as to enable them to obtain points corresponding thereto if a 1 to 50 points are expected to take place.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to offer customers with non-grade game water and offer them for gambling abandonment.