도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On March 24, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol content of 0.079% at around 00:30 on March 24, 2015, the Defendant driving a cti vehicle owned by the Defendant and a de facto marriage-related person B in the section of approximately 500 meters from the front of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu to the Sungdong-dong sexually suspended level.
2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;
A. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) above, controlled a drinking-driving and demanded the driver column for the driver’s license report and the driver’s column for the driver’s license report from the superintendent E of the police station in the YYD, and forged two copies of the report on the driver’s license under the name of F, a private document, and the report on the driver’s license statement under the name of F, for the purpose of exercising the right to ask “F” as if the Defendant was a pro-friendly F, while making a criminal act as if he was a test-oriented F, and using a test-type pen, respectively.
B. As described in the above 2-A, the Defendant submitted to the above police officer E, who knew of the forgery, as if two copies of the forged indictment report, and the report on the statement of the situation of the driving on the driving on the house were duly formed.
3. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;
A. On March 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 13:08 on March 27, 2015, 2015, at the astronomical Police Station located in Seobuk-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and was investigated as F; and (b) forged the above F’s signature with a view to exercising the signature and seal on the suspect interrogation protocol column by using a type of verification pen, which is requested by slope G to sign and seal it.
B. As stated in the above 3-A, the Defendant submitted to G the above police officer G who knew of the forged suspect interrogation protocol as if it was duly formed.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;