However, from the day this judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendants are above one year each.

1. On July 19, 2017, Defendant A, at the E main station located in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, 03:00, performed drinking together with the victim B(44 tax) at the 11st of the E main station located in Gangnam-si, 2017, the Defendant saw beer disease, which is a dangerous thing on the victim’s scrofe, and brought about three instances of the victim’s head at the scrofe and two weeks of the victim’s face at the time of drinking.

2. The Defendant 2, while drinking a victim A (44 years) and drinking alcohol at the date and time, at the place specified in paragraph 1, she saw beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the table of beer who was faced with beer with beer, and she saw the victim’s arms, face, and head flick, and got off the victim’s arms, face, and head flick, etc., requiring approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

[Defendant A]

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. A written diagnosis of damage (B);

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of photograph) (Defendant B);

1. Each legal statement of witness A and F;

1. A written diagnosis of damage (A);

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of photographs);

1. The Defendants of the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts: Articles 258-2(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant B and his defense counsel cited a beer disease, but the victim left the beer disease in his/her hand, thereby causing injury to the victim. However, although the witness F and G alleged in the court that the Defendant B used the beer disease and used the beer disease and used the beer disease to prevent the beer disease, the victim’s beer disease was reduced to the bottom of the beer disease.

The victim stated that the defendant and the defense counsel's above assertion is not accepted in light of the fact that the victim took a counter-satis of his hands and the face took place.

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the community service order: The following circumstances and reasons are as follows for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.