상이등급결정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the case, shall be written in part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as set forth in the following Paragraph 2, and except for the addition of the judgment of the court of first instance to the judgment of the plaintiff as set forth in Paragraph 3, the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus,
2. In the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the references to "appraisals" shall be referred to as "appraisals of the court of first instance" and the references to "appraisals of the court of first instance" shall be referred to as "appraisals of the court of first instance".
In the text of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the results of physical examination commissioned to a trial appraiser and the results of fact inquiry" shall be added to the macroficial evidence in the part of paragraphs (2) and (3).
After the facts of recognition under Articles 9 through 12 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following facts are added: (a) 5th to the fact that: (b) the appraiser of the first instance submitted his opinion that the disability rating of the instant case would be applied mutatis mutandis under class 7, class 8122 in consideration of the following: (c) the left-hand knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne
According to the result measured by the plaintiff's left-hand knenee-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong
3. Additional determination
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion is accompanied by Article 8-3 [Attachment 4] of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State.
8.(a)
Even if it does not constitute “persons whose safety due to damage to public figures is not less than 10 meters” as referred to in paragraph (1) of the same Article, it argues to the purport that the injury rating of the instant wound ought to be recognized as class 7, class 8122, because it falls under “a person whose change after credit due to damage to public figures, despite appropriate treatment, appears obviously to have been made in the inspection, such as X-ray photographing.”