When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On February 11, 2017, the Defendant, along with D, visited D with D, by using an inner phone called marphone at a place where no known at around 01:50 on February 11, 2017, the Defendant: (a) had access to D, “Seoul Stockholm”, etc.; and (b) had no intent or ability to arrange sexual traffic to arrange sexual traffic to the victim E; (c) had the victim’s payment for sexual traffic, “on the face of the week, to call for contact, to arrange sexual traffic,” and (d) had the victim embarked into K7 car driven by D and moved to the Gel located in F of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and was granted KRW 40,000 from the victim’s above mar to the victim for the purpose of arranging sexual traffic.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with D in collusion with the victim, thereby deceiving the victim, and received KRW 400,00 from the victim.

2. On February 9, 2017, at around 05:30 on February 9, 2017, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud with D, as well as D, had access to “Seoul Stockholm” Stockholm using an inner bitphone at an insular phone at an insular place, and the Defendant did not report the victim’s intention or ability to arrange sexual traffic to the victim H, but did not have attempted to commit sexual traffic. In spite of the absence of such intent or capacity, the Defendant reported the victim’s attempt to arrange sexual traffic.” On the same day, the Defendant was on board the K7 car operated by D and moved to Jel in the above vehicle at around 06:00, Seocheon-si I and waiting within the said vehicle, and D did not have attempted to receive money from the victim as a pretext of arranging sexual traffic from the victim’s above 303 terminal room. However, the victim did not have attempted to report it to the police.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with D in collusion, thereby deceiving the victim, and attempted to receive property from the victim, but did not commit such attempted crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Some description of a protocol (two times) concerning the examination of suspect with regard to D;

1. A E-document;

1. A seizure list (Evidence No. 523 of the record) and.