However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 16, 2012, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would pay the victim F with an amount of KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”

However, in fact, the Defendant, rather than KRW 30,000,000, was in the 20,000 foot mold, and around the beginning of March 2012, the Defendant had already received KRW 10,00,000 from the guidance and received KRW 10,000 from the guidance and had already been in excess of the debt amount of KRW 70,00,00,000, and there was no particular income or property, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 4 million from the victim on March 16, 2012, and KRW 5.1 million on March 16, 2012, and KRW 10 million on March 19, 2012, respectively, from the account of community credit cooperatives in his/her name.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second trial date);

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Investigation report (F telephone conversations of a complainant);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on transactions of passbooks;

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act; Article 62 (1) of the same Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 200

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;