2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The plaintiff issued a tax invoice of 40,320,00 won (the supply price of KRW 24,203,636, value-added tax 2,420,35, value-added tax 2,45, value-added tax 36,545, value-added tax 36,6545, value-added tax 36,6545, value-added tax 36,6545, value-added tax) for the total amount on November 30, 2012 with respect to the supply of difficult mileage film by a person who is supplied with the defendant as a person who runs wholesale and retail business, such as packaging materials and films, with the trade name of "C", and the fact that the plaintiff issued each tax invoice of KRW 40,320,00 (the supply price of KRW 36,654,545, value-added tax, value-added tax 3,65,555) is not in dispute

The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the cause of claim is that the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with goods of KRW 66,94,00 in total in the year 2012 and the year 2013, and received only KRW 32,315,00 in total. Therefore, the Defendant is obliged to pay the remainder of KRW 34,629,000 to the Plaintiff.

Judgment

The fact that each of the above tax invoices was issued in the name of the defendant as to whether a person who was supplied with goods from the plaintiff was the defendant is insufficient to recognize that the defendant was supplied with the goods from the plaintiff, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

오히려 앞서 든 증거들, 을 제1호증의 기재, 증인 D, E의 각 증언에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, D은 2010년도부터 2013년도까지 피고 등과 함께 볏짚을 판매하는 일을 하였는데, 그 작업과정은 볏짚을 모으는 일, 모인 볏짚을 동그랗게 말아주는 일, 원고로부터 공급받은 필름으로 볏짚을 감아주는 일로 구성되고, 2012년도와 2013년도의 경우 첫 번째 작업은 피고, 두 번째 작업은 D, 세 번째 작업은 E이 담당한 사실, D이 자신의 자금으로 볏짚을 구매한 다음 이를 판매하여 피고에게는 작업면적을 기준으로 평당 3,000원으로 계산한 작업대금을 지급하여 주었고, 때로는 피고에게 직접 볏짚을 팔아 피고의...