When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On July 8, 2011, the Defendant is expected to pay money to the Defendant at the large number construction office in the Dong-gu Mealdong-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoyang-si around July 8, 201, and the victim of the establishment of a university C via a telephone to the victim of the establishment of the university, who is a joint owner of the building site, in a manner that he/she receives monthly payment from the loan of money.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, from around 2008, the Defendant had been unable to repay the principal by receiving a loan from a savings bank. Since around 201, since around 201, the Defendant was in a situation where the card price was overdue because it was not paid a monthly wage from construction of the number of the above Co., Ltd. working for the Defendant, and thus, the Defendant did not have the ability to repay it even

Ultimately, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received a total of KRW 3,745,600 from July 8, 201 to December 5, 2013, a total of 14 times from the victim to December 5, 2013, as indicated in the list of crimes in the separate sheet of crimes.

2. Around December 2013, the fraud Defendant: (a) phone called to the victim C around December 6, 2013 at an infinite place where the remaining surplus water does not reach the victim’s age; and (b) made it difficult for the victim C to get off the phone.

A loan shall be repaid if a person borrows money in the name of the victim.

“A false representation was made.”

However, there was no pressure from the defendant's office, and the defendant was a plan to use money from the victim as a loan business fund, and since 2011, the defendant was not paid monthly salary from the number construction of the above corporation working for the defendant, and was appropriated for living expenses through the card loan. However, even if he borrowed money from the victim, there was no intention and ability to repay it.

Ultimately, the Defendant deceivings the victim as such, and receives KRW 5 million from the victim on December 6, 2013, KRW 50 million on December 2013, KRW 50 million on December 20, 2013, KRW 850,000 from the Defendant’s name bank account, and KRW 10,850,000 on January 8, 2014 from the Defendant’s name bank account with KRW 3 times in total.