If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one shall place an advertisement with respect to the name, manufacturing method, quality, and nutrition labelling of foods, etc., with which such foods, etc. are likely to have efficacy or effect in preventing and treating diseases, or to mislead or confuse them as medicine or health functional foods.

Nevertheless, during the period from October 2012 to March 2013, the Defendant found D’s 1,350,000 won in the instant apartment shopping mall, and talked about the product “Amphex fran,” which is a processed franchis, produced by the Amphax, “Amph fran,” and franchis franchis frans franchis fat. If urine or blood pressure exists, franchis fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat fat f.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and D;

1. Each police statement of G and H;

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 97 subparagraph 1 and 13 (1) of the Food Sanitation Act that choose a penalty;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by taking account of the following: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order reflects the instant crime; (b) there is no previous conviction in the same kind; and (c) F and D testified to the effect that they have taken the products purchased from the Defendant as a witness and considered the effect of improving their health.