The lower court upheld the first instance judgment that convicted of the facts charged of the instant case.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the intent of fraud and fraud fraud.

The argument that the medical care benefits should be claimed in cases of non-benefit treatment is the purpose of treatment is not a legitimate ground of appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not have the reason for appeal or the court below did not have to have it decided ex officio.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.