Each “Plaintiff A” or “A” among the grounds for the judgment of the first instance court shall be each “Co-Plaintiff A”, each “Plaintiff J” or “J” shall be each “Co-Plaintiff J of the first instance trial,” each “Plaintiff T” or “T”, and “BJ” shall be each “Co-Plaintiff T of the first instance trial.”

The term “U” in Part 7 of the 7th judgment of the first instance court shall be read as “Co-Plaintiff T and Plaintiff U”.

From 7th to 9th of the judgment of the first instance court, the 7th to 9th of the judgment are as follows.

The defendant asserted that the degree of the law firm did not prove that he was delegated to the plaintiff P, AA, AJ, and AK by the plaintiff P, AA, AJ, and the whole purport of the arguments. However, in full view of the evidence and the whole purport of the arguments, the defendant's right of attorney for the above plaintiffs shall not be accepted, since the court of first instance 11, 16, 12, 15, 20, 13, 20, 13, 2, 4, 6, and 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the remaining plaintiffs" are "the plaintiffs."

In the 8th sentence of the first instance court, “no permission shall be granted” following the 13th sentence of the 13th sentence, “Where there exists a reasonable ground to believe that a case constitutes a case to establish the truth, and the truth-finding is serious, the Mediation Committee may ex officio investigate the case in question, even if there was no request to establish the truth-finding,” pursuant to Article 22(3) of the Framework Act on the Settlement of History, in a case where the ex officio commenced an investigation and confirmed or presumed as a victim pursuant to Article 22(3) of the 13th sentence of the 19th sentence.”