1. Fraud, as the representative director of E Co., Ltd. on the sixth floor of the Mada Building, proposed to make an investment in the casino business of Makao in return for promising investors to pay a high amount of money, and the Defendant was willing to invite investors as financial directors of the above company.

The Defendant, at the above E office around October 2009, concluded a license agreement on the operation of the hotel casino in EMa to the victim F, and collected money in local circumstances.

Only investment can bring large profits, and it is a business without any risk, and it guarantees 10% per month as well as principal and interest.

G It is believed that all the damages are recovered in G, and investment has been made.

“A’s words are false, and C also has a license for the right to operate a marina casino, thereby raising a strict profit. In this context, C also has an investment risk.

The dividends shall be paid 10% per month and the principal shall be returned without the mold.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, the above company did not have any authority with respect to the operation of the casino at the time, and the ongoing business is merely merely to lend the casino VIP room to the customer and to receive interest. The profitability is unclear and thus, it has no ability to rapidly increase the income within the short period, and it was bound to be operated in the way to repay the investment money to the existing investors in succession by using the investment money kept by the priority investors after the lack of the ability to use the investment money kept by the priority investors. In this business structure, it is anticipated that the high-rate profit of the agreed high-rate fund will not be paid to the investors, so there is no intention or ability to pay the investors a high-rate allowance.

The defendant and C, as such, deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, are the above company on October 23, 2009.