However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Criminal Power] On October 10, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Ansan District Court’s Ansan Branch on October 10, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

At around 01:30 on June 1, 2020, the Defendant driven a E-Malaysia car in the state of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.186% from the front of the “C” alcohol house located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, to the front of the same Gu D.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Investigation report, report on the situation of a drinking driver, notification on the results of the control of drinking driving, and record of drinking measurements;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing summary orders;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The fact that it is highly necessary to eradicate the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act; the defendant re-driving the drinking alcohol despite the history of punishment for drinking driving; the interval between time and the same crime is close; the driving distance of the defendant is considerably high; the defendant recognizes and reflects the facts charged; the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding the fine; the defendant's age, character, character and environment; the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as ordered in consideration of the sentencing conditions stated in the arguments of this case.