2. It is recognized that the length of the defendant's driving is not so long as 1 km, 1.5 km each, and that the defendant recognized the crime and is in depth against the defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendant continued to drive without a license even after the license for driving was revoked, and that there seems to be no reason to consider the background of the Defendant’s driving, and that the lower court appears to have rendered the sentence by taking into account the above favorable circumstances of the Defendant as seen above, and all other circumstances constituting the conditions of sentencing as indicated in the record, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, occupation, family relation, etc., the sentence of the lower

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.