When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On March 14, 2019, the Defendant received a proposal that “I would give a loan if you send the e-mail card for the purpose of the repayment of a loan,” from the person who was not the name of the Defendant, and sent the e-mail of the Defendant in the Defendant’s office in three-dimensional B apartment C, by inserting one e-mail card connected to the D Bank account (E) in the name of the Defendant, and by bringing the e-mail article into the nameless one, and by informing the person who was not the name of the password using F of the password.

As a result, the Defendant promised to provide a means of access in return for an intangible expectation interest that can receive future loans, and lent it to a person who has not been named.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on warrant correspondence data;

1. Relevant Article 49 (4) 2 and Article 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;