When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[Criminal Power] On June 23, 2008, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1,500,000 as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

On November 4, 2019, at around 23:20, the Defendant driven Csch Rexroth car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.068 percent from the north Square in front of the Pquare, which is located in the G apartment, to the front of the B apartment in the same city.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employer-employed driver (A);

1. Notification of the results of the drinking driving control (A);

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, reply reports (A) and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes on criminal investigation reports;

1. Relevant provisions of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty for a crime;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has a record of being punished for a drunk driving, and since June 25, 2019, the penal provision for a drunk driving was strengthened, and the defendant was also able to easily understand the above circumstances through the media, etc., and there is a need for strict punishment in that he/she was a drunk driving.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by taking into account the following circumstances: the Defendant recognized the instant crime and divided his mistake; the Defendant has no record of punishment in excess of the fine yet; and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, such as the circumstances after the crime, etc.