2. As shown in the reasoning of the judgment of the court below in light of the following facts: (a) the defendant has been punished several times for fraud; (b) the defendant started the crime of this case under several Acts once again for three months after the execution of the punishment was completed for fraud; (c) the victim's amount of damage was significantly large and has not been supported by recovery from damage; and (d) other various sentencing conditions in the records and arguments, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, method of crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. Accordingly, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is groundless.