beta
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.08.07 2013고정354

근로기준법위반

Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative director of the D Co., Ltd. located in Seocho-si.

On May 9, 2012, E, a worker of D Co., Ltd., ordered the Defendant to remedy that the said Regional Labor Relations Commission reinstated E on July 25, 2012 and would normally have worked during the period of disciplinary action and dismissal, and that the Defendant did not comply with the above remedy order even though the above remedy order became final and conclusive around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written award;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning the promotion of implementation of the order for remedy and the notification of accusation;

1. Relevant provisions of the Acts concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 111 and 31(3) of the Labor Standards Act selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (in cases of conversion into 50,000 won a day);

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (see, e.g., Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of KRW 1,000,000 under the suspended sentence;