When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving a vehicle in Category C New EF rocketing.

1. On February 6, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, while under the influence of alcohol at around 18:30 on February 6, 2015, driving the said car at the same time, and making it turn to the left at the front of the elementary school at the beginning of the beginning of the year at the beginning of the year at the right 119 safety center.

Since there is a three-distance intersection where signal lights are installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive in accordance with the signals by reducing speed and by properly examining the right and the right of the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left in violation of the signal, and caused the victim D (23 Does, South) who is operating a straight fladon with a high tide on the face of the mast west, to go beyond contact with the victim D (23 Does, South) who is operating a green fladon.

Accordingly, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc. in a shoulder that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

2. On February 18, 2015, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (divated driving) at the beginning of the year when he/she gets on February 18, 2015, another stiff.

In the vicinity of the restaurant, the car was operated in the state of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.229% under the influence of alcohol in the section of the 500th section of the 500th National Assembly.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Part of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. Part of a protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Notification of the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, a survey report on the detection of the driver at driving, a response to a request for appraisal, a field photograph, and a medical certificate [the statement of the police officer F sent after an accident is credibility in light of the background, contents, and the relationship with the defendant, etc. of the statement, the defendant's assertion is not consistent, and thus, it is difficult to believe that the defendant's assertion is not consistent, and the numerical value according to the measurement of blood collection is the same.