2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

A. On February 11, 2016, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) reported to Gangnam-gu Seoul E (hereinafter “E”) F 23 Dong 22 (hereinafter “E”), to the Defendant on January 11, 2016, the Appointor C transferred to E 4 Dong Dong 5 (hereinafter “instant report site”); and the Appointor D on March 10, 2016, EH 27 Dong 501 (hereinafter “instant report site”); and on March 24, 2016, the instant report site, the instant report site, the instant report site, and the instant report site to the Defendant, respectively.

B. On March 16, 2016, the Defendant sent a reply to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) to the effect that “the move-in report submitted with a thickness was not transferred under the E-Relocation Report Processing Plan (hereinafter “instant Disposition”). On the same day, the Defendant rendered a disposition to the designated party C refusing to accept the move-in report on the same move-in report on March 10, 2016 (hereinafter “instant Disposition C”), which stated in the Supreme Court Decision 2015Du58492 Decided March 10, 2016, as the grounds for rejection of the move-in report on the same move-in report on the resident registration (hereinafter “the instant Disposition”). On March 25, 2016, the Defendant rejected the move-in report on the ground for rejection of the move-in report on the Plaintiff’s move-in report on the same move-in report on the Plaintiff’s move-in report on the ground for rejection of the Disposition in the instant case’s rejection of the move-in report on the Plaintiff’s move-in report on the same date.”

C. The Defendant, on February 1, 2017, sent a business trip to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) on several occasions at the move-in report submitted to Korea with a thickness.