성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
The defendant shall be ordered to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 40 hours.
Punishment of the crime
[2017 Highest 2495]
1. On February 1, 2017, at around 19:23, the Defendant taken one photograph of the victim’s name influent bridge part, where the Defendant was equipped with a gallon-ray 5 subway lines in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, which remove the sound of the camera shooting from the subway 5 lines D, the Defendant used the A5 smartphone’s camera function to remove the sound of the camera shooting in the Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.
2. On February 2, 2017, at around 08:37, the Defendant taken one photograph of the part of the victim’s name in which the Defendant was on board the electric car departing from the said D basin as soon as possible in the manner described in paragraph (1) in the manner described in paragraph (1).
3. On February 11, 2017, around 15:58, the Defendant taken three-time photographs of the victim’s name knee, knee, knebbbbbbs, etc., knife, knife, knife, etc., knife in the front line of subway No. 5, which passed near the Seoul Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Branch.
4. On March 4, 2017, around 17:04, the Defendant: (a) discovered red flapsing in G market near the exit of the F Station No. 3 located in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul; (b) discovered the victim’s name and influence; and (c) taken 39 photographs of the victim’s bridge, flabbbbs, etc. in the manner described in paragraph (1).
5. On March 4, 2017, at around 17:15, at the same place as Paragraph 4, the Defendant taken four photographs of the part of the victim’s name and influent bridge, on which the Defendant reported stampling in the same manner as Paragraph 1, at the same time as Paragraph 4.
6. On March 5, 2017, at around 15:08, the Defendant discovered the Victim K (V, 20 years of age) that was short in front of I in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu and sought a J market, followed the victim, and tried to photograph the bridge of the victim in the same manner as Paragraph 1, but did not come up with the victim’s bridge.
Accordingly, the defendant has a camera function.