가.특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(배임)·나.배임수재
Do 2017 Do 14015 A. Violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Misappropriation)
(b) Dried trees;
1. (a) A;
2. A. B
3. b. C.
Prosecutor (as to Defendant B)
Attorney D, IF, and IH (for Defendant A)
H (Attorney I, K, J, or L in charge for the purpose of Defendant B)
Attorney II (National Assembly for Defendant C)
Seoul High Court Decision 2017No 390 decided August 18, 2017
June 19, 2018
all appeals shall be dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are determined.
For the same reasons as the judgment of the court below, the court below maintained the judgment of the court of first instance, which rendered a verdict of not guilty, on the ground that the facts charged against the defendant Eul were not proven as a crime. In light of the records on the grounds of the judgment of the court below, the above judgment of the court below is justifiable, and the judgment of the court below is just, and it does not err in the misapprehension of the legal principles on co-principals, etc., or in the misapprehension of the legal principles on co-principals, etc., or in violation of the principle of evidence trial due to the violation of the rule of logic and experience, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.
Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.
Justices Park Jung-hwa
Justices Park Sang-ok
Chief Justice Lee Ki-taik