정정보도 등
1. Defendant B Co., Ltd. within three days from the date this judgment became final and conclusive,
A. G Internet site (H) political aspect.
Basic Facts
The plaintiff is an artist who works in the name of "M".
Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant G”) is a press organization that publishes “G”, a daily newspaper, and operates G’s Internet site (H), and Defendant E (hereinafter “Defendant E”) is a press organization that publishes “I”, a daily newspaper, and operates I’s Internet site (J).
Defendant C, as a reporter affiliated with Defendant G, is a person who coverages and prepares articles concerning the articles of this case 1 and 2 as seen below, and Defendant F is a reporter affiliated with Defendant E, who coverages and prepares articles concerning the articles of this case 3 and 4 as seen below.
On November 2, 2016, Defendant G posted an article that “K” as the title “K” on the online site politics (hereinafter “instant article”) stating that “the Plaintiff had a influence on P, a neighboring side of the O in the process of selecting the N author” (hereinafter “instant article”). The specific content is as indicated in attached Table 5, and Defendant G published the content of the said article as indicated in attached Table 6, as indicated in attached Table 6, on November 2, 2017.
(hereinafter “L” on October 31, 2016, Defendant E influenced the relationship with R, which was the Director of Qua at the time of the process of selecting the Plaintiff as N author, as the title “L” on the I’s Internet site culture.
“The contents of the article in question (hereinafter “instant article”) are inserted, and the specific contents are as indicated in Appendix 7, and Defendant E, as indicated in Appendix 8, as indicated in Appendix 8 on November 1, 2017, published the said article as it is on the 5th page of I as seen above (hereinafter “instant article 4”). 【The grounds for recognition”), without dispute, the respective descriptions of evidence A1 and 3, and the purport of the entire argument of the Plaintiff, Defendant G’s claim against Defendant G for a corrective statement claiming for a corrective statement regarding the purport of the argument as to the purport of the entire argument, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation. As such, Defendant G damaged the Plaintiff’s reputation by expressing the following false facts in Articles 1 and 2.