When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 1, 2015, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant’s case, such as violation of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act, against 2014 order 1148 order 2017 order from the court of law No. 15:00 to the Gangnam District Court 217 order, and had the Defendant give testimony.

Defendant 1 testified in relation to building Gangnam-si C and ground in the course of the examination of the above witness, and “The owner of the building shall have his father.”

“To own” the prosecutor’s question.

The answer is called "," and the statement of the title is required to be held.

It is difficult to see that the family members are members of the same family, and it is actually difficult to see that the family members are members of the same family, who will actually pay money to build the building, and who will be aware of who will own the building.

“I think I think I would be “I” to the prosecutor’s question.

I reply, and I have the honor to ask the prosecutor’s question “Is whom I own the land.”

The testimony " shall be made, and "Isle City C, D, Gangnam-si E, and F land shall be owned by a witness."

In response to the prosecutor’s question “e.g.,” and “G land in Gangnam-si was originally owned by the witness.”

The term "the prosecutor's question" is the same.

Before registering the transfer of ownership on April 5, 2013, the witness was continuously owned.

In the case of "A prosecutor's inquiry". "A person who testified as a witness and establishes and operates (State) H around 2010 shall be the husband of the witness."

The prosecutor testified to “e.g.,” the prosecutor’s question.

However, in fact, the actual owners of building C and ground, D, Gangnam-si E, G, and F were not the defendant, but the actual operators of H were not the defendant's husband.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each protocol of public trial (No. 1148 of order 2014), each protocol of witness examination (No. 2014 order 1148 of order 2014 order 1148 of order 2014 order 201. 1. 3.