For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court is justifiable to have determined that the instant institution of prosecution cannot be deemed as significantly deviating from the discretionary power of prosecution.

In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal principles on the abuse of the right to institute a public prosecution or the validity of the period under Article 257

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.