beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.11.30 2017고정1069

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 5, 2016, 06:27, the Defendant: (a) had a good appraisal with the victim D in a private village living with the Defendant; and (b) had access to the bulletin board; (c) posted a photograph taken by the victim and the victim’s male-child group together; and (d) filed a complaint in a way that “I will listen to this two-year impule.”

Men's name F 30 years old and 24 years old and present South Korea's name D. 24 years old and added 200,000 won with an interest rate of 200,000 won, and is the same son's name D. with a long-term siren, with a money to be repaid, and with a money with a match.

F. When f.o. f. f. f. her f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

In addition, a woman D who threatens and threatens to see that he or she has a large number of megas, and that he or she has a age to drink, only when he or she was under the conditions of her age, and that he or she she has a Mexico and she has a megain her me in the Republic of Korea.

B. Livenished Livenished Livenish from the streets

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ” 라는 사실과 다른 내용의 글을 게시하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim's reputation by disclosing false information through information and communications networks with a view to slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D (List 2);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint (including the list 1 and the table);

1. Paragraph 1 of Article 70 of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. for Facts constituting an offense, and Article 70 (2) of the Act on Promotion of the Protection, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., is obvious that the

Fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. It appears that the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order has no record of criminal punishment except for the confession, reflectivity, and the judgment before and after the suspension of the sentence of this case, and that the person of Grade III with a intellectual disability has a aspect leading to the speech and behavior of the above person.