2. The instant crime committed by the Defendant is favorable to the Defendant, inasmuch as the Defendant insults the Victim F and G, a police officer belonging to the D District District C, which is located in the window C of Changwon-si, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer H, and the Defendant recognized the instant crime and against the mistake, etc.

However, the Defendant was not only punished several times due to the same or similar crime, but also committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he was committed in the period of repeated crime due to the previous conviction in the lower judgment. The State’s legal order and order are established and the public authority is eradicated to eradicate the light of the need to strictly punish the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties; the victims did not agree with the victims; and other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, background, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, are too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.